<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review of Eric Baum\&#8217;s \&#8221;What is Thought\&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.numenware.com/article/261/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.numenware.com/article/261</link>
	<description>Religion. Brain. Dogen. Language. Japan.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.numenware.com/article/261#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2004 18:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.numenware.com/article/261#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Hello Bob,
I enjoyed your review of Baum\&#8217;s What is Thought.  I have many of the same reactions.  It is so philosophically naive, it is an easy target of ridicule.  But, on the assumption that the guy is intelligent and means well, what is the truth of what he is trying to say?

I have to produce a review for a psychology journal and I want my approach to be as constructive as possible.  Can you give any hints on how to find the good in this book and praise it?

Best regards,
Bill Adams</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Bob,<br />
I enjoyed your review of Baum\&#8217;s What is Thought.  I have many of the same reactions.  It is so philosophically naive, it is an easy target of ridicule.  But, on the assumption that the guy is intelligent and means well, what is the truth of what he is trying to say?</p>
<p>I have to produce a review for a psychology journal and I want my approach to be as constructive as possible.  Can you give any hints on how to find the good in this book and praise it?</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
Bill Adams</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
