<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gautama&#8217;s Darwinian boost?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.numenware.com/article/463/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.numenware.com/article/463</link>
	<description>Religion. Brain. Dogen. Language. Japan.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bob Myers</title>
		<link>http://www.numenware.com/article/463#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Myers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 06:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.numenware.com/article/463#comment-267</guid>
		<description>Alex is correct that the dates are not consistent (off by 3,300 years) and I do not have any additional evidence for a correlation. Thanks to him for pointing this out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex is correct that the dates are not consistent (off by 3,300 years) and I do not have any additional evidence for a correlation. Thanks to him for pointing this out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.numenware.com/article/463#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.numenware.com/article/463#comment-265</guid>
		<description>Just found your blog, and I&#8217;m really enjoying it, but I have a question about your dates.  Everything I&#8217;ve read has put Buddha at 2,500 years old, but the articles state the changes occurred around 5,800 years ago. How are you seeing a correlation?

I&#8217;m curious because if you have something else to back this up, and I just missed it by accident, it could also lend credence to the idea of an &#8216;axial age&#8217; at that time when a number of prophets arose independently around the ancient world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just found your blog, and I&#8217;m really enjoying it, but I have a question about your dates.  Everything I&#8217;ve read has put Buddha at 2,500 years old, but the articles state the changes occurred around 5,800 years ago. How are you seeing a correlation?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious because if you have something else to back this up, and I just missed it by accident, it could also lend credence to the idea of an &#8216;axial age&#8217; at that time when a number of prophets arose independently around the ancient world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
