<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The religiobiological stance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.numenware.com/article/469/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.numenware.com/article/469</link>
	<description>Religion. Brain. Dogen. Language. Japan.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Henderson</title>
		<link>http://www.numenware.com/article/469#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 08:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.numenware.com/article/469#comment-260</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;(until someone suggests a better word)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, if what you&#8217;re looking for is to be less specific to organised religion and 
include pesonal development and transcendant experience&lt;/blockquote&gt;
then why not Mysticobiology.

Religions are one of the manifestations of mystical thought, which, in the context of &#8220;neurotheology&#8221;&#8217;s assumption, would rely on similar processes.

Incidentally, I agree totally with your analysis of the term neurotheology, and in fact this is exactly why I don&#8217;t trust that field: I can&#8217;t help to feel that either the main people in it can&#8217;t understand or care about basic rules of how words mean things, in which case I don&#8217;t see how they are fit to understand much else in any interesting or rigorous way, or they do, and this word coinage betrays a different agenda than the one you subscribe to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>(until someone suggests a better word)</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, if what you&#8217;re looking for is to be less specific to organised religion and<br />
include pesonal development and transcendant experience<br />
then why not Mysticobiology.</p>
<p>Religions are one of the manifestations of mystical thought, which, in the context of &#8220;neurotheology&#8221;&#8217;s assumption, would rely on similar processes.</p>
<p>Incidentally, I agree totally with your analysis of the term neurotheology, and in fact this is exactly why I don&#8217;t trust that field: I can&#8217;t help to feel that either the main people in it can&#8217;t understand or care about basic rules of how words mean things, in which case I don&#8217;t see how they are fit to understand much else in any interesting or rigorous way, or they do, and this word coinage betrays a different agenda than the one you subscribe to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.numenware.com/article/469#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 17:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.numenware.com/article/469#comment-253</guid>
		<description>I&#8217;ll be interested to see your religiobiological take on Landmark Forum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be interested to see your religiobiological take on Landmark Forum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
