<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Book Review: The Universe in a Single Atom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.numenware.com/article/488/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.numenware.com/article/488</link>
	<description>Religion. Brain. Dogen. Language. Japan.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 01:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CECILIA FROM ARGENTINA</title>
		<link>http://www.numenware.com/article/488#comment-867</link>
		<dc:creator>CECILIA FROM ARGENTINA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 16:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.numenware.com/article/488#comment-867</guid>
		<description>What he meant saying we&#8217;re not random creatures doesn&#8217;t mean that we&#8217;re not random genetically, he was speaking about the laws of the universe, specially one law: the Karma. This law says that every cause has an effect, and every effect has a cause, so we are an effect created by a cause. Genetically this was translated into a mutation but spiritually speaking, our existance has a cause, a purpose, and a meaning. We&#8217;re here to evolve, to achieve greatest states of consciousness, and to follow our evolution after &#8220;death&#8221;, to get rid of Sansara wheel, and become enlighted. These are the aspects of Buddhism that cannot be put toguether with science. I hope this is useful to understand Buddhism better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What he meant saying we&#8217;re not random creatures doesn&#8217;t mean that we&#8217;re not random genetically, he was speaking about the laws of the universe, specially one law: the Karma. This law says that every cause has an effect, and every effect has a cause, so we are an effect created by a cause. Genetically this was translated into a mutation but spiritually speaking, our existance has a cause, a purpose, and a meaning. We&#8217;re here to evolve, to achieve greatest states of consciousness, and to follow our evolution after &#8220;death&#8221;, to get rid of Sansara wheel, and become enlighted. These are the aspects of Buddhism that cannot be put toguether with science. I hope this is useful to understand Buddhism better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kai</title>
		<link>http://www.numenware.com/article/488#comment-966</link>
		<dc:creator>Kai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 14:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.numenware.com/article/488#comment-966</guid>
		<description>We &lt;span class="caps"&gt;ARE&lt;/span&gt; random (biological creatures)? How do you know that? I would respectfully suggest that is just an assumption, and that any biological creature is a combination of both random and non-random processes, with the latter prevailing until the time of death when an organism can no longer to  maintain self-organizing order against the forces of entropy. Maybe i&#8217;m just stating the obvious, while the writer perhaps intended to convey his belief that humans are not &#8220;special beings endowed ... with no purpose.&#8221; I withhold my judgement on that one. I&#8217;m reminded here of the fragment of a lyric from The Kinks&#8217;s singer Ray Davies: &#8220;if life is for living, what&#8217;s living for?&#8221;  Beat&#8217;s me, but it&#8217;s certainly an interesting ride.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We <span class="caps">ARE</span> random (biological creatures)? How do you know that? I would respectfully suggest that is just an assumption, and that any biological creature is a combination of both random and non-random processes, with the latter prevailing until the time of death when an organism can no longer to  maintain self-organizing order against the forces of entropy. Maybe i&#8217;m just stating the obvious, while the writer perhaps intended to convey his belief that humans are not &#8220;special beings endowed &#8230; with no purpose.&#8221; I withhold my judgement on that one. I&#8217;m reminded here of the fragment of a lyric from The Kinks&#8217;s singer Ray Davies: &#8220;if life is for living, what&#8217;s living for?&#8221;  Beat&#8217;s me, but it&#8217;s certainly an interesting ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Christian Prophet</title>
		<link>http://www.numenware.com/article/488#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>A Christian Prophet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.numenware.com/article/488#comment-301</guid>
		<description>We love the Dalai Lama and appreciate his efforts to awaken the world to a spiritual awareness. Messages on the Holy Inheritance blog would seem to indicate that the only way to really focus on humanity is to focus first on God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We love the Dalai Lama and appreciate his efforts to awaken the world to a spiritual awareness. Messages on the Holy Inheritance blog would seem to indicate that the only way to really focus on humanity is to focus first on God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
